Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Reclaiming Public Control of Money-Creation

Posted 4 years ago on Sept. 12, 2017, 9:26 a.m. EST by flip (7101)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

By David Bollier, originally published by David Bollier blog

Most people don’t really understand how money is created and what political choices are embedded in that process. As a result, the privatization of money-creation is largely invisible to public view, and the anti-social, anti-ecological effects of privately created, debt-based money go unchallenged.

Mary Mellor, professor emerita at Northumbira University in the UK, wants to change this reality, as she explains in a recent essay, “Money for the People,” at the Great Transition Initiative website. Mellor, the author of Debt or Democracy and an expert on the development of alternative economies, writes that we must create new public circuits for money-creation so that we can direct money toward socially and ecologically needed activities, and not just the types of debt-driven loans that banks deem profitable. In other words, money-creation need not be controlled by private creditors in the course of creating debt.

The average citizen knows that banks are too powerful and often predatory, but they may not realize that the state has largely ceded its power to create new money (“seignorage”) to banks. Banks create new money out of thin air when they make loans. That money is not something they otherwise hold in a vault. It is literally created when a loan is approved. That is how banks make profits.

The power to create new money is something that the government could feasibly control and administer itself, for the benefit of all. But governments have surrendered their power of seignorage to the private banking system and its investors.

This has far-reaching, negative impact because, as Mellor explains, “It is the private, bank-issued money system that leaves us with a pernicious cycle of debt and growth. Money could encourage socially and ecologically sustainable production and consumption, but only if it ceases to be a creature of the market and is reclaimed as a social and public representation of value.”

I highly recommend Mellor’s essay because it deconstructs some of the basic, unquestioned premises of modern banking and money-creation while opening up new vistas for progressive action. Even Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and their followers have not gotten their heads around the idea that the public could credibly reclaim its power to create debt-free, socially useful money. But this would require the creation of new types of public institutions and processes for creating money for public purposes, and avoiding the pitfalls of political capture and inflation.

Mellor writes:

“Neoliberalism, which has influenced so much of the conventional thinking about money, is adamant that the public sector must not create (‘print’) money, and so public expenditure must be limited to what the market can ‘afford.’ Money, in this view, is a limited resource that the market ensures will be used efficiently. Is public money, then, a pipe dream? No, for the financial crisis and the response to it undermined this neoliberal dogma. The financial sector mismanaged its role as a source of money so badly that the state had to step in and provide unlimited monetary backing to rescue it. The creation of money out of thin air by public authorities revealed the inherently political nature of money. But why, then, was the power to create money ceded to the private sector in the first place—and with so little public accountability? And if money can be created to serve the banks, why not to benefit people and the environment?” In other writings, Mellor has pointed out the remarkable fact that “quantitative easing” carried out by the US Government to bail out banks is not regarded as public debt. QE gave away the game. It conspicuously demonstrated that the government itself (and not just banks) could create money out of thin air, and do so without it being considered public debt. The trillions of dollars created to prop up banks following the 2008 financial crisis, after all, was a case of the sovereign state creating debt-free money. (The banks are not going to repay those trillions.)

Mellor insists that “states can and do ‘print money.’ First, it is produced ex nihilo by central banks to provide cash and support for the money-creating activities of the banking sector. Second, money is created and circulated as the government spends, in the same way that banks create money as they lend. States spend money and then offset their expenditures against tax revenue and other income received.”

“All modern currencies are “fiat money,” created out of nothing, their value sustained by public trust and state authority,” write Mellor. “So why are states and their citizens shackled in debt? Why can’t the people simply create the money they need free of debt? Why can’t that money be circulated in a not-for-profit social or public sector?” She answers: “….if money is created and circulated initially by the public sector, then there is no need to ‘raise’ money through taxation. Rather than preceding public expenditure, taxation would follow it, retrieving publicly created money from circulation in amounts sufficient to keep inflation in check. If the public sector is much larger than the private sector, taxes might have to be quite high.” But these “expenditures” of new money would serve social and environmental needs without having to meet the profit-making criteria of banks.

In the rest of her essay, Mellor outlines how a new public circuit of money could be responsibly administered by new public institutions without creating inflation or resulting in special-interest abuses of the money-creation power (as if that does not already occur right now, via banks!). She envisions “a shift from profits to provisioning would put the main focus of the economy where it belongs: on the sustainable meeting of needs. That goal would be met through a combination of a basic income (that is, a monetary allocation to each individual as matter of right) and a budget for collective expenditures on public services and infrastructure.”

To work well, a robust democratic process would be needed to ensure an effective form of participatory budgeting and strong oversight of monetary decisionmaking and implementation. But with such a system, money-creation would not just finance “development” that can no longer be sustained by the planet’s finite resources, it could facilitate the provision of economic security and sustainable livelihoods for all.

It’s time for commoners to open up a new debate about the politics of money-creation. The rise of blockchain-ledger software (the engine behind Bitcoin) is already doing this. Digital currencies are showing how voluntary collectives can create their own functional currencies that let communities (and not banks) capture the value that communities create. That represents a potentially huge shift of political power. It’s also time to bring the politics of fiat currency (conventional money) into this discussion, as Mary Mellor’s fascinating essay does



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by agkaiser (2515) from Fredericksburg, TX 4 years ago

some links to your sources for this excellent post:


'... Mary Mellor, professor emerita at Northumbira University in the UK, wants to change this reality, as she explains in a recent essay, “Money for the People,” [http://www.greattransition.org/publication/money-for-the-people] at the Great Transition Initiative website....' [http://www.bollier.org/www.greattransition.org]

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 4 years ago


[-] 1 points by ImNotMe (1488) 4 years ago

Simply - BRILLIANT! Thanx for this EXCELLENT forum-post and tho' I have no time for an expansive reply here right now - in compliment, please do consider my very recent reply and links to you here:

fiat lux ...

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 4 years ago

glad you liked it - thought you might

[-] 1 points by ImNotMe (1488) 4 years ago

For OWS' #S17, 6th Anniversary, this is a definitive forum-post so TY again flip & cross link to:

fiat lux ...

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 4 years ago

yea i thought it was very good also - from a site out of the UK i think resilience.org. lots of interesting info about the economy, energy, food and farming and more.

i am not a fan of micah white although i don't know too much about him. my boy noam would say protests can be helpful if they lead to increased awareness but good old fashioned organizing is what we need. what those commie jews did in the 20' and 30's. knock on doors - pass out leaflets - talk to people - change minds

[-] 1 points by ImNotMe (1488) 3 years ago

''From Debt Peons To Wage Slaves'' by Dr. Michael Hudson:

Which ends .. ''For half a century Americans imagined themselves getting richer and richer by going into debt to buy their own homes and educate their children. Their riches have turned out to be riches for the banks, bondholders and other creditors .. not for the debtors. What used to be applauded as “the middle class” turns out to be simply an indebted working class.''

I can concur with much of your 2nd paragraph & here is a video of MW and Zephyr Teachout - speaking at Bard College's Hannah Arendt Center on 12th Oct. 2017:

veritas vos liberabit ...

PS: Long Time No C! Bar very briefly, very recently but do take care not to fall for Trashy-Manqué's b-s!

ie., see - http://occupywallst.org/forum/occupiers-are-getting-jobs-at-big-companies/#comment-1075944

Hope U, mayda & crew are well & all goes good for U & all. Keep looking in here. Things are hotting up!

pax, lux et amor ...

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 3 years ago

good to hear from you - i check in very rarely these days. all good on our end just busy - and you? seems to me that trump is good for resistance

[-] 1 points by ImNotMe (1488) 3 years ago

''American Society Would Collapse If It Weren’t for These 8 Myths'' - by the rather xcllnt Lee Camp:

I'm well & busy with life, love & the pursuit of liberty for myself & others. Keeping this place going will be important for the next 2 years as 2020 & a possible Bernie &/or 3rd Party run become ever more likely. I hope U & mayda & all your crew are & stay well. Any news from The Alaskan? Look in on us here when you can flip.This place has a wider readership than any of us can guess. Solidarity to U and all comrade.

pax vobiscum ...