Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: For the Sake of Clarity

Posted 11 months ago on May 20, 2014, 8:22 p.m. EST by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

me

Someone was wondering if I was some senile old troll, and if perhaps I was a moderator and if so, how on earth did that happen? The post is shadow banned now, but you know. I'm sure he has sock puppets, and they are all gathered around and whispering to themselves, so I thought I would, you know, set the record straight:

Everything you need to know about me may be found right here.

I am not a forum moderator. Never have been.

I am not a communist - but I do not object to the philosophy nor oppose those who are. I do recognize that it simply is not possible to convert the political and economic structure of a nation the size of the United States from a republic whose economy is based on principles of capitalism, to something that more closely resembles the communist ideal. It isn't possible because there are something like 300 million people whose perceptions of government and of society would first necessarily require some radical reconfiguration. The most efficacious method of achieving such a radical transformation is with the utter collapse of the entire social structure.

While the utter collapse of the entire social structure may not be all that far away - in fact the unknowns of Global Warming may induce such disruptions in food production and produce such a volume of environmental refugees - even here in the United States - that the utter collapse of the entire social structure may be inevitable. Yet it remains something that I do not advocate.

I find it better that we stand together, prepare now, gird ourselves for what is to come and do all that we may to mitigate the worst of these . . . unintended consequences . . . of the industrial revolution.

At this point of course it can no longer be said that the consequences are in any way unintended in the least.

I find the repelican party today stands firmly in the way of any serious attempts to address the issue - they oppose not only our own vital national security interests but the security interests of the entire world. They do so for the sake of nothing more than their own ease and comfort, and to maintain their own diseased grip on the reins of power.

The repelican party is ripe for destruction.

Our national security demands it.

And you . . . trashy macaque . . . you pink pantied penis poser and inbox spam bomb botterist and lame ass skank ass repelican shill . . .

me .



.

One year ago today . . .

17 Comments

17 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by Shule (2411) 11 months ago

Do you work for, or are otherwise affiliated with, the Democratic party?

Not to say that is good or bad...

[-] 1 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

Who are you asking? If me, no, and no. I am a registered independent, and have ran for office as an independent. I am not a fan of either party.

[-] 3 points by Shule (2411) 11 months ago

Actually, I was asking the author of the post; ZenDog.

[-] -1 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

Yes, that's clear now. When I replied your comment was under one of mine, and not under the main post as it is now. I've noticed that this forum rearranges things sometimes.

[Removed]

[-] 5 points by Shule (2411) 11 months ago

Actually, I also campaigned heavily for Obama in 2008. I'm just upset with him now because he did not go through on any of his campaign promises that matter. Besides he screwed me out of that gold plated health care plan I used to have which I worked a life time to obtain paying gold plated premiums. But that doesn't make me a Republican as you are so quick to accuse me of. Just 'cause one is no longer a Democrat, does not automatically make one a Republican.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

A coherent statement followed by counter productive and uselessly antagonistic rhetoric?

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

Not really, I can agree with a lot of what you have to say. I just don't get the seemingly irrational rants. You ask good questions, ones that make people think, that's good. Then you go off for no apparent reason at all. Just my observations.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

OK, I get it your mad. Why are you mad at me, I mow my lawn with a goat, 0 fossil fuel used.

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

Since I am the one doing it, I think I would know if it was manipulation. But you see things your way I suppose.

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by wickerman (62) 11 months ago

OK, I tried.

[Removed]

[Removed]