Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Media Blackout As Obama Appoints First Ever Assassination Czar

Posted 2 years ago on May 24, 2012, 2:05 p.m. EST by NewStart2012 (112)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Media Blackout As Obama Appoints First Ever Assassination Czar

Posted by Alexander Higgins - May 23, 2012 at 12:53 am

“Corporate news blackout as Obama designates John Brennan as the sole person in charge of designating people to be assassinated. John Brennan, Obama’s chief counterterrorism advisor was a name that you did not see on the Mainstream media today as they continue to run stories that serve to distract the masses from stories that matter.

Most recently he publicly spoke about the drone program calling it moral and ethical and just…”

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/05/23/media-blackout-obama-appoints-assassination-czar-137181/

15 Comments

15 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by jedidiah (2) 2 years ago

Why is that pathological liar even employed. He's the one who spun the stories of "bin Laden hiding behind his ladyfolk". Pathological liars can't resist gilding the lily.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

the sole person in charge of designating people to be assassinated.

the battled fields moves a little fast for that

[-] 1 points by TruthRightsFreedom (259) 2 years ago

This is one reason we need an Article V Convention.

The unconstitutionality is getting embedded deeper and wider by consolidating in the power of individuals who are insulated from accountability.

[-] 1 points by NewStart2012 (112) 2 years ago

I agree, and its happening faster and faster too. What kind of following has an Article V Convention gained? Do we go after the American politicians to do something here for their own people, or do we expose the globalists who have infiltrated so vastly and are insulated from accountability? Which will get us safer faster? Which be be the most reasonable to pull off? Should we do both?

[-] 1 points by Renneye (3317) 2 years ago

I think we should do both.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (34992) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

An Article V convention right now would play into the hands of the corrupt.

The American People are in no position whatsoever to support a successful convention and we do not have trust worthy representatives in office.

The Constitution would be stolen and destroyed at this point in time.

[-] 1 points by TruthRightsFreedom (259) 2 years ago

Why so afraid of the constitution? But, in a sense you are correct, but in no way is that something that cannot be remedied.

I was inclined to agree perhaps before about November of 2011 when I saw the Article V debate proceeding here. I saw one guy trying to make unity around Article V. He initiated the notion that by placing ART5 after a members username at registration. People started going along with it, THEN the whole thing stopped. Meanwhile I'm getting some real information about the law and constitutional intent at this forum.

http://articlevconvention.org/showthread.php?33-Amendment-By-Layers-Of-Priority-Amendment-Package-Making-CONST.-Intent

Article V must have it and it comes from the people and without free speech they cannot agree upon it. Those proposed amendments in preparation for Article V, Completely obviate your every concern.**

Any waste, I ended up learning about all that and realized that the web forum admin must be anti constitutional, meaning, very likely, that OWS is a giant "cognitive infiltration" or co-opting of dissident energy by would be usurpers of the U.S. Constitution.

Please address what the un-abridging of free speech can do to address the problems you write about in relation to the environment created by proper preparation for Article V as you work to discourage Americans from using their constitution.

[-] 2 points by Renneye (3317) 2 years ago

I agree that we need to be VERY cognisant of the possibility of "cognitive infiltration". It could be the difference between our success or failure. I've posted information about this before. Its not very popular, lol! But I think it is soooo important to be aware, so that we can effectively use OWS for our own benefits despite that it may have elite hands all over it.

Is the link in your post ok? I clicked and it had a warning on it. Is this just a diversion warning that I should ignore? I'd really like to see the info.

[-] 2 points by TruthRightsFreedom (259) 2 years ago

Americans have to discern between distraction and function. When solid legal process is present, then we are seeing the potential function. When the legal basis is weak, or not present, and there is no accountability to the fact, THEN the activity is suspect because the PTB would never promote that Americans use a functional legal process but would send infiltrators to create a false social acceptance of something that cannot function.

The malware warning is BS. Basic sabotage of some kind. I've been trying to get it dealt with but the process is highly technical and it look as though I'll have to learn it myself. Yes, ignore the warning. It only pops up on page changes.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (34992) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Check out my post on uniting in common cause there is much there pushing for the people to regain their government and for kicking out the corrupt in government as well as prosecuting white collar criminals and more.

The issues and actions posted there are very strong actions towards regaining government and establishing a healthy society.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

demand elections be national and state holidays

If elections are national holidays, a greater number of people will take the time to vote.

When more people vote, more people care about the actions of their government.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (34992) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I would love to see a week leading up to election day devoted to preparing and inspiring the people to vote. Make it what it should be a celebration of Democracy.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

it must be a holiday

anyone working that day should receive double time

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (34992) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I used to get that when working the Day shift at CDC on holidays.

Double time and a half for second shift and triple time for third shift.

Was not all that great as you took a good hit on taxes.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

I can't be bothered to keep my receipts

[Removed]

[Removed]